Thursday, June 13, 2024
HomeMachine LearningEpic's proposed cures are unhealthy for everybody however Epic

Epic’s proposed cures are unhealthy for everybody however Epic


Final month, Epic Video games requested a U.S. federal court docket to impose dangerous and unwarranted adjustments to Android and Google Play that will undermine the privateness, safety, and total expertise of customers, builders, and system producers. Not solely do Epic’s calls for go far past the scope of the current U.S. trial verdict — which we can be difficult — however they’re additionally pointless as a result of settlement we reached final yr with State Attorneys Basic from each state and a number of territories.

We just lately shared with the court docket why we strongly object to Epic’s proposal — and at a listening to later this week, financial consultants will reinforce the the explanation why Epic’s proposed cures are problematic and pointless. This consists of:

  • Epic’s proposal places Android customers’ safety in danger on third occasion app shops: Epic’s proposal removes Google’s skill to implement belief and security measures that preserve Android customers protected. In contrast to iOS, Android permits OEMs to preload third occasion app shops and permits customers to obtain further app shops straight. To take care of a constructive consumer expertise whereas additionally offering selection, Android incorporates commonsense measures to guard consumer safety and privateness – measures which might not be allowed underneath this proposal.
  • Epic’s proposal hurts the privateness of Android customers: Beneath Epic’s proposal, Google could be pressured to inform any and all third occasion app shops which apps a consumer has put in on their telephone via Google Play. It might wrongly expose an individual’s private apps utilization – even for subjects like faith, politics, or well being — for Epic’s achieve. This can be a clear violation of consumer privateness.
  • Epic’s proposal leaves folks susceptible to malicious apps: In contrast to on iOS, Android customers have the choice to sideload apps, that means they will set up an app straight from a developer’s web site with out going via an app retailer. We’ve applied vital protections to make sure customers are nonetheless protected whereas having fun with selection in apps. Nonetheless, Epic’s proposal would drive Google to take away them — severely curbing our skill to guard customers from doubtlessly malicious apps.
  • Epic’s proposal reduces builders’ management over their app distribution: Builders have many choices for app distribution on Android, however once they select to make use of Google Play, they know the belief and security guidelines that preserve our platform protected. Nonetheless, Epic desires to drive all different builders to publish their mental property via a number of channels with out their consent. Beneath this proposal, builders might all of a sudden discover their app on a retailer with out the identical consumer protections or in a retailer that carries inappropriate or offensive content material they don’t need to be related to.
  • Epic’s proposal cuts off key enterprise alternatives for builders: As a part of the State Settlement, we now have already agreed to not signal wide-ranging exclusivity agreements with builders to launch their full app catalog on Google Play. However Epic desires to thoroughly limit Google’s skill to supply any monetary incentives to builders to distribute their apps within the Play retailer, even on a non-exclusive and app-by-app foundation. Epic’s proposed treatment would additionally stop Google from working with builders to offer any unique content material via apps distributed within the Play Retailer. This can be a widespread technique used to interact customers and develop a developer’s enterprise, but Epic is looking for to restrict this vital alternative for all builders.
  • Epic’s proposal hurts system producers: A part of the State AG settlement ensures that any app retailer is free to compete for placement on an Android system. However Epic’s proposal would lower Google Play out of this course of, decreasing competitors and due to this fact enabling rival app shops to underbid. This would cut back what OEMs can earn from pre-installation and placement on their gadgets, chopping into already slim OEM margins in a method that would elevate client costs.

Epic’s proposed cures had been all clearly designed to solely profit itself. They’d hurt the Android ecosystem, and competitors on the whole, by creating safety and privateness dangers, depriving builders and OEMs of key enterprise alternatives, and undercutting Google’s skill to assist our investments in Android and Google Play. We’ll proceed to vigorously defend our proper to a sustainable enterprise mannequin that permits us to maintain folks protected, companion with builders and OEMs to innovate and develop their companies, and preserve the Android ecosystem thriving and wholesome for everybody.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments